Vote details
Open: 2024-06-21T00:00:00Z→2024-07-05T00:00:00Z, or until decided
- Proposed by: @Nym_team
- Eligible voters: @Operator
- Min. quorum: 50% (of node operators who registered on the forum before voting ends)
- Type: Single majority
Summary
The Nym reward algorithm currently only rewards mix nodes, but not entry or exit gateways. This is going to change so that all participants in the active set - whether acting as mix node, entry or exit gateway - are rewarded for their crucial work.
From client to destination, the active set will now have five rewarded layers to include both gateways and mix nodes:
Layer 1 - entry gateway
Layer 2 - mix node 1
Layer 3 - mix node 2
Layer 4 - mix node 3
Layer 5 - exit gateway
If you opt to run both in gateway and mix node modes, your node may be selected to do work in in any of these five layers for each epoch. Operating gateways, particularly exit gateways, may come with operational risks in some regions. Therefore, your votes below answer the following underlying question:
How much premium should exit gateways receive over mix nodes and entry gateways to compensate for their operational risk?
Mix nodes, entry gateways and exit gateways are all equally crucial for the success of the network, and by extension for the success of you, the operators. Therefore, establishing the right incentive for the community to operate enough exit gateways is crucial.
Further information
This post contains a simplified explanation of the rewards algorithm. Before you vote on the two proposals below, I highly recommend reading the detailed explanation and watching the community call dedicated to this topic with Claudia Diaz (Nym Chief Scientist) and Igor Smirnov (Technical Delivery Lead).
Proposal 1 - 2-hop traffic
Choose the reward split for entry gateways and exit gateways. The split simply determines the premium for the exit vs the entry.
- entry gateway 40% - exit gateway 60%
- entry gateway 33% - exit gateway 67%
Proposal 2 - 5-hop traffic
Choose the reward split between entry gateways, mix nodes and exit gateways.
- The first two options give entry gateways a higher premium to recognize that they do additional work compared to mix nodes (checking credentials and maintaining client connection state), while exit gateways receive a premium for the additional risk they might face legally as they interface with the clearnet.
- The 3rd and 4th options treat entry gateways the same as mix nodes and only provide a premium to exits.
- Split: 20-16-16-16-32
Layer 1 - entry gateway: 20%
Layer 2 - mix node 1: 16%
Layer 3 - mix node 2: 16%
Layer 4 - mix node 3: 16%
Layer 5 - exit gateway: 32% - Split: 20-15-15-15-35
Layer 1 - entry gateway: 20%
Layer 2 - mix node 1: 15%
Layer 3 - mix node 2: 15%
Layer 4 - mix node 3: 15%
Layer 5 - exit gateway: 35% - Split: 17-17-17-17-32
Layer 1 - entry gateway: 17%
Layer 2 - mix node 1: 17%
Layer 3 - mix node 2: 17%
Layer 4 - mix node 3: 17%
Layer 5 - exit gateway: 32% - Split 16-16-16-16-36
Layer 1 - entry gateway: 16%
Layer 2 - mix node 1: 16%
Layer 3 - mix node 2: 16%
Layer 4 - mix node 3: 16%
Layer 5 - exit gateway: 36%
You can change your vote any time, until the topic is closed. Once voting closes you will not be able to change your vote.